Wednesday, September 30, 2020

To mask or not to mask

Let’s start with “You shall love your neighbor as yourself. On these two commandments depend all the Law and the Prophets.”  But how do we do that in a Covid environment?

Then the potential disagreement.  Any discussion will be influenced by a perception of how serious the disease is.  If it is just the flu then all of the panic is unfounded and we are wasting our time.  If it is significant, then we have to respond.  I lean toward the latter – 200,000 deaths in the US over the last year compared with 50,000 flu deaths; 90 people a day in ICU in Iowa; long term affects including mental and other body-system failures being reported, one of my staff informing me that they never want to go through that again…

If then, the disease is significant: how do we demonstrate love; what do people need? 

  •          To hear the Gospel – but they will only listen if we meet the other needs below
  •          To be protected from getting Covid – I would still argue that this is indeed critical and can’t think of any reason to not do it if it is possible
  •          To be supported if they get Covid
  •          To be supported if they lose jobs or income
  •          To be encouraged while isolated

The elephant in the room is: how many illnesses and deaths are acceptable against crashing the economy?  Life is precious, yet we all die.  So what is the value of a life? Does it change with age, I.Q., skin color, economic status or sports ability?  How many jobs lost vs how many sick people? 

Maybe a useful way to consider this is on the basis of risk.  All jobs involve some risk.  Pavement engineering is one of the worst.  No one is allowed to work in my lab without hours of training.  All my staff on construction sites have to wear hard hats, steel-toe boots, and reflective vests along with ear- and eye-protection.  We seek to control the risk to so-called “acceptable” levels with “appropriate” actions.  The hard part is defining the details of what is appropriate and acceptable.

So in an age of Covid, if someone has to go to work, or chooses to serve, play or fellowship with others, it behooves them to control the risk, yes to themselves, but just as importantly, to the people they meet there and come home to afterward.  https://covid19risk.biosci.gatech.edu/ indicates that attending a function in Story County with 100 people means a 75 to 99% risk that someone in the group is infectious.  The scary part is that that infectious person may not be aware of their threat to the community.

We are required by scripture to gather, worship, exhort and encourage, but can we do that with “acceptable” risk?  Likewise, we are all bored with isolation (included us introverts), and the looming winter is aggravating that frustration; we need each other. A model of managing risk in the context of worship may be the Chinese underground church.  They do gather, quietly and carefully, trying to fly under the radar of the authorities – they are not filling crystal palaces.  Similarly, when we gather we should manage risk by doing what we can to limit exposure.  We have to consider carefully whether our practices are truly scripturally required, or just tradition.

I am also very nervous about endorsing any activity solely based on someone saying “God told me,” because most of us have lousy hearing and often His voice is drowned out by our own desires.  It happens that God does speak to us directly, but mistakes also happen (been there done that).  We have to filter such instruction through all of scripture.  Likewise, “God will protect me” does not ring true with other diseases, so why should we expect it to apply here.  We have to care for our temples, by actions such as getting flu shots, not eating excess licorice, not walking in the middle of the expressway, and by avoiding people who may infect us.

Also worth noting, is that the Romans 14 passage is addressing a church that is trying to turn around generations of indoctrination.  To eat or not to eat certain foods is simply a conscience issue because, in general, food will not kill us unless indulged in excess (including the guy who died of licorice poisoning last week).  A modern parallel may be a discussion on whether should I wear a suit to church. A decision either way is not going to affect the well-being of anyone else involved.  However, in the context of Covid, exposure to the bug could hurt you, regardless of what you think of it or how invincible you think you are.  Choosing to avoid harming others is a moral issue and far more than just conscience or being religious.

A better picture of how Jesus dealt with contagious diseases are the passages on leprosy.  This illness was also extremely contagious, debilitating and incurable, hence the laws to separate the sick from the healthy.  Jesus healed the few lepers he met, but he did not heal all lepers alive at the time.  When those individuals were healed, they were instructed to submit themselves to the authorities before they were allowed back into the community.  He did not make leprosy go away, and he did not override the protective systems in place.

The part where the church should be setting a shining example to the community is in the other tasks: supporting those in need or are struggling with being trapped at home.  We are called by scripture to serve those in need – including those who are infectious. That may include deliberately and sacrificially exposing ourselves to greater risk, but can we do that without risking them, or our families?  An example is the medical staff living in RV’s rather than going home.  We also need to watch our motivation in providing that service – is it to flaunt our bravery and resources, or to live out the gospel?

Some argue that masks don’t work, yet Dr. Fauci, among many others, repeatedly tells us that masks and space go a long way to reducing risk, and seem to be an easy, “appropriate” and “effective” ways of demonstrating love.  Refusing to do that simple action in the name of invincibility, rights, or because they are uncomfortable and look stupid is way beyond a matter of eating forbidden food, and appears to be profoundly selfish. 

Philippians 2:3-4 “Do nothing from selfish ambition or conceit, but in humility count others more significant than yourselves, 4 Let each of you look not only to his own interests, but also to the interests of others.”

When I go to the office, everyone does it without complaining.  So why are the Christians being so resistant to doing something so easy?  I suspect it is because they are being manipulated by a politically informed obsession with “freedom” and “rights” that is not biblical.  Jesus clearly instructs us to lay down our rights for others, and our freedom is not to do what we want, but to do want He wants: to be a living sacrifice; to love our neighbor.

To quote one of my hockey fan colleagues “Wear the …. mask, it’s not like we are asking you to wear a Toronto Maple Leafs Jersey.”